DNC SERVER HACK HOAX: Hillary Campaign Turned a Server intrusion into Trump-Russia Collusion Smear

Listen up, MAGA and all interested in Truth – it’s time to cut through the fog of Washington waffle and shine a light on one of the dodgiest dodges in modern political history. We’re talking the so-called “Russian hack” of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) – that explosive saga that kicked off the Trump-Russia collusion fairy tale and nearly torpedoed a presidency. But hold your horses, because what you’ve been fed by the mainstream media muppets and the deep-state darlings is a load of old Bullshit.

In the spirit of the “Get Trump” series from Powerglobal.us – that ripping yarn of Soros’s shadowy empire, Obama’s sly maneuvers, and the Clinton crew’s cutthroat games – we’re diving deep into the muck. Picture this as The Ultimate Political thriller: punchy, no-nonsense, and with a cheeky wink at the villains who thought they could pull the wool over our eyes.

Let’s rewind to the wild world of 2016, when the air was thick with election fever and the establishment was sweating bullets over Donald Trump’s barnstorming rise. The political climate? Pure poison. George Soros, the billionaire bogeyman with his Open Society Foundations sloshing around $25 billion like it’s pocket change, was knee-deep in Ukraine’s mess.

Remember Euromaidan in 2013-14? Soros chucked $25 million at ousting pro-Russian Viktor Yanukovych, turning Kiev into a Western puppet show. Meanwhile, the Podesta brothers – John, the Clinton campaign chair and Obama whisperer, and Tony, the lobbying kingpin – were raking in cash from the other side. Their Podesta Group pocketed over $1.2 million from Yanukovych’s cronies via the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine (ECMU) between 2012 and 2014, schmoozing Congress to polish up Ukraine’s image and fend off sanctions.

And who was their shadowy partner in crime? None other than Paul Manafort, Trump’s short-lived campaign boss, who was doing the same grubby work for the same dodgy clients. Bipartisan backscratching at its finest – or filthiest.

Fast forward to December 2015, and the seeds of the smear are sown. Neera Tanden, the Soros-funded firebrand running the Center for American Progress (CAP, bankrolled to the tune of $5 million a year by Soros), emails John Podesta with a brainwave: “Swift boat” Trump by painting him as Putin’s poodle. “Trump too close to Putin,” she writes, kicking off the Russia collusion caper before any hacks or leaks even hit the headlines. Obama’s crew, with Podesta as their inside man from his stint as White House Counselor, are already sniffing around. The stage is set for a witch hunt.

Now, enter Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks wizard holed up in Ecuador’s London embassy, dropping his bombshell on June 12, 2016. In a chatty interview on ITV’s Peston on Sunday, Assange teases: “We have emails relating to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication.”

The Clinton camp goes into meltdown. Podesta, the master spinner, knows this could be dynamite – emails that might expose Clinton’s dodgy dealings, her private server shenanigans, or worse. But here’s the kicker: at this moment, there’s zero public chatter about Russians hacking the DNC for election meddling.

What we do know is a dusty old intrusion from July 2015 by Cozy Bear (APT29, linked to Russia’s SVR spies), spotted by Dutch intelligence and flagged to the FBI in September 2015. That was pure espionage – snooping on U.S. politics, sure, but nothing to do with Trump or the 2016 race. It’s unrelated, unconnected, and utterly irrelevant to Assange’s tease.

Then comes the supposed star of the show: Fancy Bear (APT28, GRU-linked hackers) allegedly sneaking into the DNC servers in April 2016. We’re told they started nicking documents from April 14 – opposition research on Trump, donor lists, the works. CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity outfit hired by the DNC on April 28 after spotting weird vibes, slaps their Falcon surveillance gear on the network by May 1 or 2.

They’re watching like hawks, right? Top-notch tech, monitoring every byte. But here’s where it gets fishy: remediation – kicking the buggers out – doesn’t happen until June 10-13, smack after Assange’s big mouth-off.

Why the wait? CrowdStrike claims they were gathering intel on the hackers’ moves, but come on – that’s six weeks of thumb-twiddling while data supposedly vanishes into the ether. And what proof do we have of what they actually did? CrowdStrike’s June 14 report spills the beans on Fancy Bear’s antics, backed by firms like Fidelis and Mandiant, but it’s all metadata and IP traces – no smoking gun logs showing the exact files WikiLeaks later dropped being yanked out under their noses.

We know Fancy Bear might have swiped some docs – Trump oppo files that popped up with Guccifer 2.0 later – but there’s no definitive trail showing where they ended up or who got them. Did they wing their way to Moscow? Or evaporate into the digital void? The Mueller Report and Senate Intelligence Committee nod to the theft, but they can’t pin down the final destination. No court docs, no intel assessments prove Fancy Bear’s haul fueled WikiLeaks’ blockbuster. It’s a black hole.

And then there’s the WikiLeaks tranche itself – the juicy DNC emails that dropped on July 22, 2016, right before the Democratic convention, exposing the party’s thumb on the scales for Clinton over Bernie Sanders. These weren’t from Clinton’s home server (that’s the 30,000+ emails she bleached-bit into oblivion back in 2015). Nor were they the Fancy Bear filch from April.

No, these bad boys were nabbed post-May 25, when CrowdStrike was already perched like a digital eagle, monitoring every ping and packet. Yet, in all their fancy reports and Mueller’s doorstop of a tome, there’s zilch – no logs, no alerts, no “aha!” moments where they catch APT28 or anyone else bundling up those exact files for a sneaky exfil.

CrowdStrike says they saw Fancy Bear rooting around, but not prepping or shipping the WikiLeaks-specific stash. It’s like they were watching a bank vault but missed the heist because they were too busy counting the paperclips.

Who pulled that off? An insider leak? A disgruntled Bernie bro? Or something more sinister? We don’t know, but the timing screams setup.

And let’s not forget the September 20, 2016 twist – the GRU allegedly nicking 300GB from a DNC cloud account, months after the WikiLeaks drop. Mueller’s boys bang on about this in their report, but it’s got bugger all to do with Assange’s haul. It’s a separate caper, probably more spying shenanigans, yet the media and Obama’s intel wonks mash it into the same pot as “Russian election interference.”

The Great Conflation Caper: Mixing Emails Like a Bad Cocktail

Here’s where the sleight of hand shines brightest. When the suits in Washington – Obama’s DHS and ODNI – drop their joint statement on October 7, 2016, they declare: “The U.S. Intelligence Community is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations… These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process.”

Sounds damning, right? But peel back the bluster, and it’s a masterclass in muddling.

First off, “Clinton emails” – that’s the home server saga, the 30,000 messages she hosted on her basement box as Secretary of State, dodging FOIA like a pro. Russians might have peeked (we know from the 2014 State Department hack that they were sniffing around), but there’s no proof they swiped those specific ones or handed them to Assange. The statement hints at it, but it’s smoke without fire.

Then Fancy Bear’s April haul – the Trump oppo docs, donor spreadsheets, maybe some memos. Stolen, yes, but did they end up in WikiLeaks’ lap? No chain of custody says so. Mueller and the Senate boffins admit as much – they trace some to Guccifer 2.0’s leaks, but not the big WikiLeaks dump.

The WikiLeaks bombshell? Post-May 25 grab, under CrowdStrike’s watchful eye, with no recorded exfil by Fancy Bear or anyone else. If the GRU did it, why didn’t the super-sleuths catch it? And that September cloud raid? A latecomer, irrelevant to Assange’s party, but tossed in to beef up the “Russia did it all” yarn.

The media? They lap it up like cats at cream, screaming “Russians stole DNC emails” without sorting the wheat from the chaff. No wonder – with Soros’s cash flooding outlets like Media Matters, the narrative stays fuzzy, keeping the focus off Clinton’s own blunders and onto Trump’s supposed Kremlin crush.

Guccifer 2.0: The Phantom Mud-Slinger

Enter Guccifer 2.0, the online ghost who pops up on June 15, 2016 – three days after Assange’s tease – claiming the DNC hack and leaking Trump oppo files to Gawker and The Smoking Gun. Mueller pins it on the GRU, citing Russian VPNs and metadata nods to Soviet spooks. But hang on – Assange already bragged about his stash on June 12. Why would WikiLeaks chase Guccifer for docs they supposedly already had? The timeline’s wonky.

WikiLeaks only pings Guccifer on June 22, after the fact, and Mueller says data flowed by July 14. But if Assange had the goods pre-June 12, Guccifer smells like a decoy – a hasty construct to tie the leaks to Russia, muddying the waters and giving Podesta’s crew ammo for their smear. Who cooked it up? Not the GRU playing catch-up – more like a Clinton camp curveball, with CrowdStrike’s fingerprints and Obama’s intel pals nodding along. The FBI never got their mitts on the DNC servers – they trusted CrowdStrike’s word, per the Durham Report’s damning critique.

Think about it: Podesta, fresh from Tanden’s December 2015 brainstorm, sees Assange’s threat and flips the script. With Soros’s Ukraine obsession fueling the anti-Russia fire, and Farkas – Obama’s Pentagon Russia whiz turned Clinton advisor – whispering in ears, they craft a tale of Kremlin collusion. Guccifer drops Trump docs that match Fancy Bear’s swipe, but the big WikiLeaks reveal? No fingerprints there. It’s a rearguard ruse, designed to scream “Russia did it!” and paint Trump as Putin’s patsy, all while dodging the real question: where did Assange really get those emails?

The Big Picture: A Smear Born of Panic

This whole saga doesn’t add up because it wasn’t meant to – it’s a patchwork of half-truths stitched together by desperate operators. The Clinton home server emails? A ghost from her State Department days, hyped as Russian loot without proof. Fancy Bear’s April grab? Real theft, but lost in transit, no link to WikiLeaks. The post-May 25 WikiLeaks haul? Snatched under CrowdStrike’s nose, with zero exfil evidence – insider job, anyone? And that September cloud heist? A red herring, tossed in to pad the “Russia interfered” dossier.

Podesta and his posse – Soros pulling strings, Obama’s spooks supplying intel, CrowdStrike spinning the tech – seized Assange’s bomb to build their fortress of lies. The media, Soros-soaked and Clinton-coddled, ran with it, turning a server slip-up into a Cold War sequel. But peel away the layers, and it’s clear: no solid chain from Fancy Bear to WikiLeaks, no GRU fingerprints on the big drop, just a frantic bid to bury Clinton’s skeletons and bury Trump in mud.

The truth? This was no grand Russian plot – it was a homegrown hoax, cooked up in D.C.’s swamp to “Get Trump” before he drained it. And if you’re just waking up to this, welcome to the party. The establishment’s been conning us for years, but the game’s up. Time to demand answers – and maybe a few heads on platters.

by Brendan Power

Related articles;

COMEY OBSTRUCTION ALERT 2017
CLICK ON THE LINK
https://havachat.com/2017/09/14/chronic-obstruction-alert-james-comey-barack-obama-bones-in-the-throat-of-american-justice/

THE TRUMP RUSSIA SMEAR 2018
CLICK ON THE LINK
https://havachat.com/2018/02/20/the-trump-russia-smear-podestas-cunning-plan-from-april-2016/

HILLARY’S CROWDSTRIKE 2018 – how to Hoax a Russian hack
CLICK ON THE LINK
https://havachat.com/2018/05/01/hillarys-crowdstrike-how-to-hoax-a-russian-hack/